Free Consultation
(314) 500-HURTIllinois drunk driving laws are in place to punish drunk drivers and deter future misconduct. Depending on how drunk someone was, if they have had previous violations and other factors, penalties can range from a moderate fine to mandatory prison time.
However, when a drunk driver injures someone else, simply punishing the driver is not enough. People injured in a drunk driving accident need to be compensated for their injuries. To do so, they can file a personal injury claim against the driver’s insurance company or in civil court. While the principles of duty of care, negligence and damages apply to drunk driving accident cases the same way they do to any injury claim, there are other laws and legal principles and precedents specific to drunk driving claims.
“Per se” in Latin means “intrinsically,” “in itself” or “by itself.” Negligence per se is a legal doctrine that anyone who violates a statute or law is automatically liable for the damage they cause as a matter of law. Drunk driving is obviously illegal under Illinois law, and it violates 625 ILCS 5/11. When we sue drunk drivers, we file a separate negligence per se charge.
Typically in personal injury claims you have to prove that the defendant owed you a duty of care, negligently breached that duty and that their negligence directly contributed to your injuries. In a drunk driving claim, you only have to show that the driver was drunk and that the accident caused your injuries.
A “dram shop law” is a law that allows people to make a claim against a licensed alcohol vendor if they served someone who caused their injuries alcohol beforehand. The Illinois Liquor Control Act is relatively liberal compared to other states’ dram shop laws in that it does not require that the vendor did anything wrong, such as selling to someone underaged or who was visibly intoxicated. You must prove three things to win a dram shop case:
Dram shop laws are essential if your damages exceed the at-fault driver’s policy limits.
Claims can only be made against licensed alcohol vendors who sell alcohol that is meant to be ingested on their premises. Meaning, usually, a bar or restaurant. You cannot sue a grocery store or liquor store for your injuries.
Each year, the Illinois Office of the Comptroller sets a limit to how much you can recover from a vendor in a dram shop liability claim. In 2022, those limits are $77,787.30 per injured person, or $95,073.37 per injured person if the accident results in loss of support or loss of society.
Some states have what is referred to as “social host liability,” where someone who throws a private party, or allows a friend to get drunk in their home, can be held liable. Illinois is not one of those states. In Cruse v. Aden, 127 Ill. 231, 239, 20 N.E. 73 (1889), the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that you cannot sue someone: who, in his own house, or elsewhere, gives a glass of intoxicating liquor to a friend as a mere act of courtesy and politeness.
In Cunningham v. Brown, 22 Ill.2d 23, 174 N.E.2d 153 (1961), the court affirmed that no social host law exists in Illinois.
There is one exception. In 2004, Illinois passed the Drug or Alcohol Impaired Minor Responsibility Act. The act stipulates that someone can be held liable if:
If an adult allows a minor to drink on their residential property, but does not willfully provide the alcohol, they cannot be held liable.
Punitive damages are not included in most personal injury claims. They are meant to punish the defendant for egregious recklessness and deter future misbehavior. In most cases, such as being injured by someone who was texting and driving, or slipping after a store failed to clean up a wet spot, punitive damages do not apply as the behavior is not wanton, intentional or egregiously reckless.
However, Illinois courts sometimes allow plaintiffs to seek punitive damages in drunk driving cases. 735 ILCS 5/2-1115.05 states that, in order to recover punitive damages: a plaintiff must show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant’s conduct was with evil motive or with a reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and with a conscious indifference to the rights and safety of others.
A skilled car accident lawyer will be able to convince a court that drunk driving, especially if their blood-alcohol content was far over the .08 limit, presents a highly unreasonable risk of harm and a conscious indifference to the safety of others.
A claim for punitive damages must be approved by the court, and the award may not exceed three times your economic damages.
If you were injured by a drunk driver, assuming the police were called, that driver was arrested and is facing criminal charges. However, the criminal case and your civil suit are two entirely different processes with different codes and laws guiding them. In a criminal case the state is prosecuting the drunk driver. In a civil case, you are negotiating with the insurance company to give you the full compensation you are owed.
The burden of proof in civil cases, called a preponderance of the evidence, is much lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal trials. While a criminal defense lawyer may be able to raise issues with the police report or doubts about the breathalyzer test to get their client’s case thrown out, those tactics do not work in civil cases. All you need to prove is that it is “more likely than not” that the defendant was drunk. Pictures of them being arrested by police, or a video of their behavior, is likely more than enough proof.
Similarly, a drunk driver does not have to be found guilty in a criminal case in order to be liable for your damages. While a criminal conviction would be a great negotiating chip to use against the insurance company, the outcome of their criminal case, whether they are found guilty or not, has no direct effect on your claim.
Another difference is the application of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The amendment allows defendants, in both criminal and civil cases, to refuse to answer questions. In a criminal case, their silence cannot be used to infer guilty. However, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976) that you can infer liability if someone pleads the fifth in a civil case.
Client Reviews
This law firm is absolutely amazing. They took on my case, when nobody else would! They fought hard for me when it seemed there was no hope. They kept me informed and always asked for my input before making decisions on my case. Gary puts himself into every case unlike most law firm owners. Gary and his team really care about every one of their clients, and fights hard to get you a fair settlement. They actually won my case out of court, and then reduced my fees to make sure I could get my car fixed and be able to get back to some normality. I would recommend Burger Law over and above any other firm! If you go somewhere else you aren’t getting the best!
View More Reviews on Google Maps and Yelp
521 W. Main Street Suite 201 O
Belleville, IL 62220
By appointment only
(618) 500-4878 GET DIRECTIONS332 S Michigan Ave Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60604
By appointment only
(312) 500-HURT GET DIRECTIONS100 Chesterfield Business Pkwy Suites 200-222
Chesterfield, MO 63005
By appointment only
(314) 648-8348 GET DIRECTIONSNO FEES UNTIL WE WIN YOUR CASE
We offer free consultations and are available 24/7 to take your call. Live chat, text, and virtual meetings are available.
or call us at
(314) 500-HURT